Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Green Battery Minerals Inc V.GEM

Alternate Symbol(s):  GBMIF

Green Battery Minerals Inc. is an exploration-stage company. The Company’s principal business activities include the exploration and development of natural resource properties. Its Berkwood Graphite Project is located within the jurisdiction of Quebec, in the Manicouagan Regional County Municipality, three hours driving time from the city of Baie-Comeau. Its Stallion Gold Project is located in the northeastern region of the prolifically metal-endowed Stikinia geological terrane. Stallion covers over 30 square kilometers and is on a regional trend with several past producing mines, such as Baker, Shasta and the world-class Kemess Mine. The Jupiter Lithium Project is an early-stage exploration opportunity which comprises a total of 122 Quebec mineral exploration claims which amount to a total of 6406 hectares. The Boudrias Project comprises a total of seven Quebec mineral exploration claims which amount to a total of 392.1 hectares.


TSXV:GEM - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Jul 06, 2024 2:38am
196 Views
Post# 36120883

GEO - grades by visual then sends off to lab

GEO - grades by visual then sends off to lab

That's the grading format i read in GEM's 43 101 for Berkwood.
Perhaps a change is needed ?

Lot's of carbon / carbon family / graphite could be missed by visual grading.
Especially if peers account for lower grades - down to 1.78% Cgr.

Next up....
Zone 6 has been worked over for the past few years.

I'm seeing a rough estimate of,
700m strike ( horseshoe ) x about 100m wide.


Image ( upper right inset image )
https://wp-greenbatteryminerals-2023.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/media/2023/09/image005-1.jpg


Press Release
Shows maps of each drill campaign of zone 6.
https://greenbatteryminerals.com/strong-graphite-assay-results-announced-by-green-battery-minerals/


Let's focus on this image ( drill yr class 2022 )
Zomm in to each drill core listed below

Stripped land  to identify graphite at surface.
My eyes see the dark graphite middle of stripped areas.

BK6 22 25 - beginning of drill hole has to pass through graphite seen at surface.

Yet... drill log intercept for BK6 22 25  in press - hits at 9m
Issue ?  it's seen as green marker on opposite side of, visual surface vein ?
1.8m intercept with only 2.29 Cgr  ?

Drill company went through vein which appear to be several meters wide.
In fact if the drill placement was shifted N/E few more meters it would intersect
a far wider section of the surface vein.

That's just analyzing  ( 1 ) drill hole.
How many are like this ?
In addition to.... Geo visual grading + not factoring lower grade Cgr.

BK6 22 23
passes right through the vein ( inline ) and no indication of, intercept on - drill line.
in fact... look to the right of this hole... far darker graphite at surface but 22 23
chose a lighter ore color placement ?


If these graphite veins are moreso... at surface.
A series of shallow drilling passing through each and direct vertical
would quickly assess each zone.


Look botton " center " of photo.
Far more graphite veining ( not drilled )  vs  drillers chose different drill placements.


https://wp-greenbatteryminerals-2023.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/media/2023/09/image009.jpg

https://wp-greenbatteryminerals-2023.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/media/2023/09/image003-1.png


  Could there be longer intercepts if.... geo factored,
- drill passing through surface veins ...?
- lower grade intercepts factored ?
- lab assaying error ?

3D MAPS ARE NEEDED
One Map of Berkwood = all historical + new holes + intercepts 2% Cgr to highest grade
One map all drill holes Zone 6 - intercepts 2% Cgr to highest grades

Recheck
Berkwood and Zone 6
comparing surface visual veining in photos  vs  drill core intercepts
Maybe there are many holes that ( visual grading ) did not send off  to lab assaying.


Hey.... i like what GEM has in, graphite.
Just want to see max value for each drill meter.



Cheers....





 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>