RE:ONE MORE...Wangotango67,
Yes. Graphano Energy Ltd representatives are moving along nicely in developing said company's graphite mines hosting lands. Actually doing what they previously stated would be done in a timely and fiscally prudent manner is Dr. Luisa Moreno's way of demonstrating success on behalf of Graphano Energy Limited.
I don't mind telling you that I own a relatively very small equity investment position with GEL.V.
Notice that recent Graphano press release which mentions the company's close proximity to NGC's Mousseau graphite property?
Graphano Energy Ltd officers and directors have little problem raising capital as needed.
I expect a partnership for Graphano Energy Ltd coming along in due course.
You spoke to graphene in one of your recent posts. I know a little something about that also natural graphite derived low layer wonder carbon material. I also know which Quebec based company holds the tittle of single largest global manufacturing capacity (4,000 tpa) process manufacturer of graphene. NanoXplore had been identified, i.e. after I told everybody about it, as a customer of Imerys Graphite and Carbon, this when Imerys SA owned the Lac des Illes graphite mine.
Clearly NanoXplore representatives have no interest in owning and having operated a graphite mine. NanoXplore had previously unloaded most (most being the operative word) of NanoXplore's exposure to the Lac Guret graphite mine development project, which is now 100% owned by Nouveau Monde Graphite.
Like Graphex Technologies LLC representatives, NanoXplore representatives would only be interested in purchasing graphite material from a company like NGC.
Although, I have to admit a thought had long ago come to mind; such a thought being that NanoXplore could perhaps, if the need were to arise and should the "PorocarbTM" material ultimately be proven as a viable product, elect to employ the Heraeus Group owned "PorocarbTM" porous hard carbon anode coating additive material for the company's SPCG anode product, a product which is also proposed as being produced at NanoXplore's proposed 8,000 tpa battery anode component material process manufacturing facility.
I highly doubt such a possibility for NGC though.
After all, NanoXplore already has it's comparatively most superior and already validated, qualified and necessarily "certified" for mass scale production by battery cells manufacturers and their respective automaker partners graphene-silicon enhanced anode additive material, "SiGTM".
That's correct. NanoXplore's "SIGTM" anode additive material is chemistry agnostic and form factor agnostic, i.e. "SiGTM" is designed to be readily employed in solid state batteries of any form factor, as well as existing non solid state Lithium-ion battery cells of any form factor.
I expect this would help you Wangotango67