PATRICK - Drum Roll.... here's my answer to your question,
Why does Volt need GEM's ores when they have EPR's who was just given
several hunderd thousand from EPR ?
Several cows in a circle.
Cow's named peter, paul, mary.
Milking each other
No milk for customers ( shareholders )
Answer # 1 - who is EPR ( formerly and behind the scenes involvement )
https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.gem/green-battery-minerals-inc?postid=36138963
Answer # 2 - bad direction - advisement
If Tom had any sensibility,
He's make a few changes and pull away from VCT mickey mouse ventures
Tap Gov funding for Hydrogen Fuel ( which is avail ) x 3 programs ( fuel / solar )
Bring onboard 2 young tech's ( skilled ) dev own R & D
Ask for their 17 tonnes back ( - 1 tonnes )
3 - 4programs
Graphite / Carbon Electrodes - Hydrogen Fuel Cells and ( ext methane fuel )
Graphite Solar Cell or Solar windows ( graphite poly film ) poly blend assists conductivity
( graphite handles 3 light spectrums )
Only have 17 tonnes out of ground... ?
Would one piss it away on, 50% share profits ( online store )
or
Maximize rhe 17 tonnes and make something spectacular / lasting / profitable
Hydrogen cells ( hydrogen gas / methane raw carbon electrode )
Solar cells
Intergrate with existing manufacturers who already make,
Portable generators ( instead of fuel / use hydrogen or... methanol
solar cells ( panels ) or ( roofing ) or ( siding ) or acrylic car paints or windows
Gov supports all 3 ( solar, hydrogen, methanol )
Methanol - 1 spec of carbon attaches to 4 hydrogen molecules.
4x the resource created.
Think like, lithium markets.
Li ------> Li2CO3 ( multiplier of 5.43x )\
Accept in this situation, 4 H are added. ( way greener )
Better than Li2CO3 Cgr batteries.
Wink.
Obviously,
GEM has been thinking begind the scenes.
Perhaps one more tweak ( revision ) they might get it right.
One more shuffle,
I don't think shareholders would mind - they'd most likely embrace the change knowing
GEM was at least trying to make a betterment of the company creating contingencies
that create more odds and at same time preserve their future as a junior.
Imagine another revised press release ?
2 tech hirees
Switch up to hydrogen fuel cells and graphite solar ?
If a juniors chooses to let another milk 50% vs junior retaining 100%
Then... whose doing the advising ----> progrnerstor of listed juniors ?
Imagine placing monies in an investment.
Can't be apart of, leadership.
Must watch from sidelines each wrong move ?
Let's reverse this...
Shareholders have control of theirs monies...
Let's sit for months doing sfa,
pass the task off to yet another company who diluted 50%
sit back collect a wage more months, years pass
would current msnagement like our leadership ?
would they b and complain ?
Cheers...