RE: I think we'd fare better with a reverse split Fastrade,
agreed that it would be silly to accept tokens. But you wont have to worry about that because AMK board would never agree to such an offer and even if they did it would NOT be accepted by swhareholders imho. the proposed transaction would be in the form of a plan of arrangement so it requries the express agreement of the board and company. Shareholders would then vote on it.
The NR is more relevant in that it is exptremely rumper dumper in its language. Vague on details yet extremely promotional in its language.....................as one poster said, ver OTC!!!!!! Theyre right. But you know why it is so OTC????? Cuz Cunnningham mining is run by Ryan CUnningham who also runs HRNC aka cunningham natural resouce on the pink sheets!!!!!!!!!!!!! They put out all kinds of pie in the sky rleases yet have not filed financial statements in years!!!!!!!! or anything else. Just unsubstantiated NRs...................
The biggest takeaway from the NR??? Cunninghsham currenlty has NO MONEY to buy AMK!!!! but theyre gonna raise hundreds of millions iwht their imaginary tokens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey, crazier things have happend......................but im not in the businses of hoping to get struck by lighting!!!
FastTrade wrote: than accepting as of yet unheard of and unproven tokens for our AMK shares with our hard earned money tied into them.
If this goes through AMK could be giving away the whole kit and kaboodal letting Cunningham steal away with 20 percent of Treaty Creek at our expense.
Afterall what will it really cost them issuing their own made up tokens costing them virtually nothing and putting the effect on AMK and its shareholders.
Is AMK only just finding this out now having been duped into the belief a cash deal could have transpired from the start?
This just reminds me of more typical pink sheets madness .