RE:RE:RE:RE:NanoXplore Competitors Consistently Delivering . . . Directvoice,
What I did state for StockscoutX is as follows.
Are you aware that NanoXplore graphene enhanced product has been certified by a division of Ford Motor Company for use in Ford's F-150 electronics enabled running boards and that Ford may very well be seeking to replace it's current use of carbon black in most, if not all, proprietary applications with NanoXplore "Graphene BlackTM" and/or NanoXplore's XG Sciences Inc GNP product?
You erredly suggested NanoXplore has a new process to make carbon black without using water that is more economical than the old process they currently using.
As suggested by Mr. Soroush Nazarpour on behalf of NanoXplore, "the company" claims to have a new "dry process" manufacturing method to produce NanoXplore "Graphene BlackTM" powder in higher volumes and possibly at the least costly price points available for it's customers within North America and possibly globally as well, e.g. customers such as Ford Motor Company and/or any as yet not identified and would be well recognized chemicals company, i.e. the very company which I originally called "the industrial Titan" many years ago.
I agree that the company's claimed proprietary "dry process" graphene powder manufacturing methods do represent a potential game changer; and yet, that merely proposed 8,000tpa capacity "dry process" graphene manufacturing facility has not yet been provided the "Go Final investment Decision or "GO FID" by or on behalf of NanoXplore.
As I previously reiterated, longer term offtake purchase agreements sufficient enough to justify a commencement of the building out of said merely proposed facility have not as yet been locked down by or on behalf of NanoXplore.
Apparently though, the representatives of Federal Candian Government funded entities, "the guaranteed" future roughly $80 Million worth of capital grants provisioners for NanoXplore, certainly know more than we do about the timing of the buildout of that 8,000 tpa "dry process" graphene manufacturing facility and whether such a propsed facility would be provided a scheduled "GO FID".
After all, had it not been for the written assurances provided to RBC representatives by or on behalf of the Federal Canadian Government funded entities or the Government of Canada directly, I seriously doubt RBC representatives would have provided NanoXplore with that $60 Million credit facility. Said credit facility being provisioned by RBC for NanoXplore was contingent uopn The Government of Canada guaranteeing it's share of provisioned capital grants would be flowing into NanoXplore as needed.
I had spoken to this all before; and yet, no movement on that front since.