RE:RE:RE:RE:NexCompress Cogent argument DD.. But Papi has his own reasons that are certainly plausible for believing what he does about what NXO has and can do with it. So IMO you are both right and you are the ram butting the oak over and over. You will not convince him he is wrong for having taken on the risk of investing in NXO. He(( you did that yourself in spades
I agree with Papi that they may have something that could find a market because demand is yet developing out there for this tech and NXO does seem to have a competitive advantage, but I am totally in your camp in their historical inability to deliver on their promises. There is only Pristine but so far I have not heard any cash register ringing loudly.
Mining, the pivot through Spectrum to flat lenses for telescopes and cell phones, DoubleTake, ALLiS, ALiiS, NexCompress have yielded zilch and in all those years management has been burning through investor money. The share float is huge
That they are not communicating with shareholders is not a good sign. You can find dead threads at stockhouse where companies have simply disappeared ...is that the future of NXO?
Who knows. Hope for Topper most that this will come alive and do something along the lines Papi suggests. But at this point they have to show me.
And if they do, and I have some spare cash ...I might ride along a bit. Till then, glad I'm out
Damn1212 wrote: Heres the issue with your Analogy
Nvidia has sales and had Revenue Right away when they started their company , they have a history of success , they have a history of delivering. The reinvested their revenue and produced more products that sold and reinvested again and produced more products that sold again and again. A proven track record.
NXO is on the other end of the spectrum. They started out as a jr minning company, then they became a Tech company with blade optics and then we all know the story ect ect ect . The have never had any sales , never have any revenue . They promised lots and delivered nothing but losses. Their track record is that they take investor money , burn it and produce losses and no sales and no revenue . 100% of the time this is what they have done. not for 1 year ...2 years ... 3 years ... but for over 10 years.
Is it really beyond your ability to comprehend that after 10 years of constant failure people would obviously cease to believe what the company says ?
Paul has said soo many things over the years that never happened that i for one do not believe him anymore. The only thing they delivered are losses and failure.
So please comparing NXO to Nvidia is really not fair to Nvidia.
You rather NXO stay silent ?
Really ?
I as a shareholder would like to know why they have been halted soo long and if they ever intend on operating again or if they are shutting down.
No matter what Papamoe Supports NXO .... no matter how many times they will fail ... Even if they go bankrupt Papamoe will still support NXO.
Reality is most on here agree with me and dont think losses and silence and halts are good.