Victoria Gold Corp VITFF

Metals & Mining Gold

Victoria Gold Corp. is a gold mining company. The Company’s flagship asset is its 100% owned Dublin Gulch property, which hosts the Eagle, Olive and Raven gold deposits along with numerous targets along the Potato Hills Trend including Nugget, Lynx and Rex Peso. Dublin Gulch is situated in the central Yukon, Canada, approximately 375 kilometers (km) north of the capital city of Whitehorse. The property covers an area of approximately 555 square kilometers and is the site of the Company's Eagle and Olive Gold Deposits. It also holds a suite of other development and exploration properties in the Yukon, including Brewery Creek, Clear Creek, Gold Dome and Grew Creek. The Eagle West target area lies as close as 500 meters northwest of the main Eagle Gold Deposit and hosts the exposures of the granodiorite. The Raven target is located at the contact zone at the extreme southeastern portion of the Nugget Stock. The Brewery Creek Project is a past producing heap leach gold mining operation.

GREY:VITFF - Post by User

Victoria Gold Corp > For those not able to watch the briefing yesterday

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by HoneyBadger77on Jul 28, 2024 12:08am

87 Views

Post# 36151498

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:For those not able to watch the briefing yesterday

Zibo510, read paragraph #2 of my earlier post:

TSX:VGCX Forum Post | HoneyBadger77-36151339 | RE:For those not able to watch the briefing yesterday | Victoria Gold Corp (stockhouse.com)

And this one:

TSX:VGCX Forum Post | HoneyBadger77-36151485 | RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:For those not able to watch the briefing yesterday | Victoria Gold Corp (stockhouse.com)

And the rest of my posts that pertain to this topic.

A 'Directive' is a policy or a guideline and not law unless it derives as a result of a law in a particular statute. I'm sure VG's lawyers know which directives must be legally followed and those that are recommendations or guidelines. That's not to say the VG shouldn't follow EMR's directives but when there are costs involved, then VG has a right to question the directive and decide not to comply when there is no benefit to them, and especially since this matter is still under investigation.

If you were a suspect in an investigation would you help provide the investigator with evidence or information that could potentially help them incriminate you? Of course not since that would be against your legal rights. Building a berm and driling ground water monitoring wells at VG's expense for EMR's exclusive use so they can monitor the ground water (right at the mine site yet) for years to come is like the police investigating you and issuing you a directive to incriminate yourself. As I previously mentioned, if EMR wants / needs a berm and ground water monitoring wells, then that should have been in the original mine build plans and VG would of had no choice but to build it at their expense. That's no longer the case and so if EMR needs a berm and wells, then let them build them themselves, pay for it and stop thinking that everytime they write a directive that VG is just going to jump and spend more of their dwindling cash reserves.

My opinion only.

HB77

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Two micro-cap stocks with strong fundamentals