RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Speaking of bloodbath ...@lawi You are informed, aren't you? Add 1+1 together! Does that come to 0 for you, as you have been trying to make everyone in the forums believe for months? Not for me. For me, 1+1=2! Nano One Materials has been working with partners and the Canadian government for at least 8 years. Are you seriously trying to sell people here that all the testing was for nothing? Where are the ecological, high-performance alternatives to Nano One Materials? Are these companies further along (6K, Novonix)? All the politicians from the Canadian government and the EU who have even visited Candiac several times, all liars, the management all liars, Rio Tinto, Sumitomo Metal Mining, Worley... all liars???
And on the other hand, there is your humble little opinion? The opinion of a money-hungry conspirator? So the only one here who is telling the truth with his buddies because he is referring to the course? How narcissistic or profile-neurotic do you actually think you are?
Your theories are not based on sources, but derive their supposed persuasiveness solely from the fact that nothing concrete has been published so far. THAT'S ALL!
FAR TOO LITTLE!
This would only be an argument if there had been a LEGAL OBLIGATION to publish something! But for good reasons, this obligation has not yet existed.
>> No company is obliged to publish trade secrets without the consent of its partners and thus put itself in a negative market position compared to its competitors. It would also not be in the interest of its investors. Secrecy and patent protection are essential for Nano One Materials. Because THAT is what they sell to their customers. That is what will give their shareholders enormous added value!!! <<
Deliberately pushing down the price and then using that as the only basis for argument to make small investors fear for their investment is absolutely despicable! As I said, someone who has a lot of capital, is knowledgeable and has the ability to algorithmically push down the price in small amounts and thus derives monetary advantage from it for almost years is and remains criminal in my opinion, especially if he acts deliberately as part of a team and at the same time spreads conspiracy theories to the greatest extent possible.
Unfortunately, that is exactly what is happening, and in the last few months you have been doing so successfully here on stockhouse.com (and fortunately in vain on ceo.ca!). It is you who, under the cloak of anonymity, continues to spread your ignorance and lies and tries to justify this SOLELY with a price level you have brought about yourself.
There are a total of 111 million Nano One Materials shares issued. The daily volume is negligible. The majority of investors simply wait, like me, in the absolutely certain assumption that the company will keep to what it promised. What did it promise? Already forgotten?
https://nanoone.ca/news/a-message-from-our-ceo-may-2024/
https://nanoone.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/A-Letter-to-our-Shareholders-Nano-One-Materials-2023.pdf
As you know, I am 100% representing the company opinion here. Supplemented with my own observations, from years of research. I do not doubt the news published by Nano One Materials in the slightest and they, along with the interviews, are the basis for all supplementary information and observations.
https://nanoone.ca/news/?paged=1&filter_block%5Btaxonomy%5D%5Bresource_type%5D%5B%5D=news-releases
Once again: "Actually, there should be no place in public forums for liars and conspirators like you." Simple!
>> Helping to artificially create a situation (because that is what the long-term sell-off of positive company news is all about) and then using this situation as an argument (FUD campaign) is fraud. It's that simple! <<
But people like you don't seem to be getting enough of it for the money, do they? Money isn't everything in life, Lawi! Haven't you learned that yet?
May life show you that as clearly as possible in the future!
Good luck!