Squaring the circleHow will Fortescue resolve the dilemma of pushing share holders out cheap, while at the same time needing 66% of 69% of the shareholders where they can not vote on for their favor - a failed take over bid would be a big headache for Fortescue who obviously wants the project as soon as possible. I still believe a fair take over bid is the best for all involved - Filo has set the stage. A failed take over bide support by the board would also raise questions regarding the viability of the board at the next opportunity to vote on and I would think that in such an environment maybe not even the Fortescue board members would get their 50% support votes - as many more pissed off shareholders will register and vote