RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Evonik is proof Mr. Beachbum, I don't have much to say to discredit you. What discredits you is when you criticize a general comment that is not out of the realm of possibility but you don't comment on specific lies posted by pumpers who you support.
I don't know how narrow you want to be about LOIs and about meaning of "smaller" when talking about companies the size of Evonik. But if you look at partnerships and the Evonik venture fund (look it up), you will find various relatively smaller organizations. The venture fund fits the HPQ bill in terms of engaging with in some form of ventures that are not fully commercialized and just that fund and their investments fit the spirit of my statement that you labelled as "falsehood". I would guess that many of those started with some LOI which effectively implies some level of due diligence before coming up with a more formal and specific agreement/contract.
Get a grip on your false accusations and target those statements that are truly false.
Have yourself a great rest of the weekend, Buddy!
beachbuminMexic wrote: Sir i don't believe Evonik has Loi's with many smaller companies there dude....Your spewing falsehoods are getting out of control...Have a great day Eh!
I don't see where i said Hpq was the only smaller company with a LOI with Evonik....DUDE. And Your response is the best you could come up with to discredit me? Show me another small cap like Hpq that has a LOI with Evonik...come on you can come up with something I'm sure....You are a real piece of work there my friend....Have a great day EH!