RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:"Bad Actors" in the Yukon are now on the loose.I am going to say this ONE last time, your poiint of view needs to be discussed with YTG, EMR, FN, ENG. and ALL stakeholders. Your mine(s) is in env. review and regardless of your feelings the ENV review will happen in light of recent Yuukon "incidents". I have no influence.
The Premier and Staff have made ir abundantly clear that new rules and regulations are happening. Your insistence on the HLP useage is admirable but again your "speach" is not with me to decide.
Right now YTG, EMR and FN are not going to cooperate, convince them.
If you are invested then it is up to you to do your DD moving forward.
I am not invested not will I be in any junior in The Yukon until the backdraft from Eagle is settled and that may take a very long time.
Rio info below, if interested. There's alot more. Don't think for a oment that YTG and FN aren't going to do The Google Thing.!
https://www.news24.com/fin24/Companies/deeply-disturbing-rio-tintos-biggest-recent-scandals-20220203 https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/headlines/3034612-mass-protests-in-serbia-against-rio-tinto-lithium-project https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-enforcement/notifications/rio-tinto-fer-titane-inc-violating-fisheries-act.html Sooner wrote: And you're not getting my multiple points...with the key one just repeated below.
It is crystal clear in all the communication I've read...the govt , the FNs , and Yukoners want mining companies who are going to be capable of cleaning up whatever (as you like to say---unlikely events) happen at the mines they operate....not leaving this for the government.
ok---so how many operating mines in the Yukon could have an "unlikely event" that they can not financially cover????
how would that compare to a Rio, BHP operating all those mines in Yukon - throwing in a district play around all explorers in Casino neighborhood...