RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Lost moneyI'm a former lawyer but this is a very specialized area of law- in the U.S., we have securities litigation attorneys that deal with this sort of thing, but I'm not sure we would have grounds for a lawsuit in Canada (or here for that matter). You have to prove that they are breaching their fiduciary duty to the shareholders. It's worth getting an actual expert opinion, but they have done the drilling and built the asset, and I'm not sure they can be liable for just really sucking at the marketing part of the job- the response could be that you can always sell your shares (even though you can't do so realistically because the stock is so illiquid). The other potential issue is compensation. If they are being over-compensated, that's one thing, but it would probably have to be really egregious to get a lawyer to take the case. Again, I have zero expert experience here so worth looking into. I certainly feel like they have not prioritzed their fiduciary duty to put the shareholders first and it would require us to have a theory of liability that we can prove that they breached that fiduciary duty. Being overly compensated and not marketing the company and dragging it on for years would all be potential bases for that claim- but I don't have the experience or expertise to know if this is just bad management or so bad that there's an actual legal claim for it. We also had a chance to vote them out (which I tried to do other than Dave and Jamie), but they got back in by a pretty healthy margin.