TAYLOR....If it were me Fubber ? I'd focus on 4 motivators.
- Gov ownership of nearby mines + Gov Grants to drillout extension zones ----> SXL's
- McDonalds 10%+ ownership and Musk connection
- Junior grounds itself with firm direction -----> all focus on Goodwin, Mine Road, Adherne
ensuring shareholders utter focus on ------> tech metsls.
- match minerals with tech... graduate from simple explorer to -----> build a valued project
Let's face it, Taylor's getting up in age.
Project generator format keeps employees happy but not shareholders.
Nickel dime money mentality must shift to -------> SXL creating large value.
Taylor has managed to secure several CM claims surrounding key mining assets.
So far... letting go nine wedge was a bad move.
They should've held onto this.
SXL needs Gov grants.
SXL needs bigger money to assist to drill Goodwin, Mine Road, Aherne.
20 holes each claim.
Zinc
Copper
Silver
= hot commodities SXL can continue to play smalltime project generator.
Or.... think bigger. SXL is off to a good start.
Current 3 drillholes cross sected historicals.
These type of new holes validate historical results.
= Taylor needs to show investors what historical info there is... if even little.
Newbrunswick drillcore dara base sucks the lemon. Horrible data records.
https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/NBDNR::exploration-drillholes-puits-de-forage-dexploration/explore?location=47.218393%2C-66.182737%2C9.00 Brunswick's longatude / latatude vs GPS is indifferent.
Hard to locate older drill holes.
I found historical drillcore data sets that might assist SXL. They'd need to match historical data with data roster.
If...present.
Search Results: 2311 Found
https://www1.gnb.ca/0078/geosciencedatabase/core/Results-e.asp?NTS1=21O&NTS2=08&Comp=&Prop=
SXL announcing a solid direction.
Keeping key claims surrounding existing mines.
Accessing Gov grants.
Seeking larger money funder with intent to build out deposits.
Introduce tech value matching zinc, copper etc...
= Correct Direction
Lastly,
seeing how the stock rescted to 3 superb drill results ?
I'd say... if market can allow shorting, swapping, flow through, foriegn investment
= Why not protect price value with stock assisted price movement on good drill results ?
Not having price movement leaves junior and sm shareholder wide open for
investment loss.
If a junior dishes out cash, labor, and succeeds in drilling good results.
Those good results must be factored into share price.
If not... system is broken - against junior + sm shareholder.
Eventually forces junior to team with funder....
leaving sm shareholders alone on opposite side.
An opinion.