Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc V.GRB

Alternate Symbol(s):  GEBRF

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc. is a developer of sustainable entry-level housing and renewable energy projects. The Company’s primary business is the acquisition, management, development, and possible sale of real estate and renewable energy projects. It operates through three segments: real estate development in the United States (Real Estate), solar energy projects in Puerto Rico (Solar Energy) and corporate headquarters located in Canada (Corporate). The Company is focused on building two large-scale projects, namely Sage Ranch in Tehachapi, California and Montalva in Guanica, Puerto Rico. Sage Ranch is a real estate community of over 995 entry-level homes in the Tehachapi Valley, a community located in southern California. Its Montalva property (1,747 acres) is a large utility-scale solar and battery storage building with an initial size of 80 MWac or 160 MWdc, located in the southwestern coastal area of Puerto Rico. Its Cordero Ranch property is located in Cedar City, Utah.


TSXV:GRB - Post by User

Comment by shnepson Aug 16, 2024 4:05pm
111 Views
Post# 36183303

RE:Money ran out long ago,

RE:Money ran out long ago,Relative to the percentage PWR could potentially get for 50% of the net profits there now becomes a lot of variables that can occur.

1. PWR has put up virtually all the money for the purchase and development costs of Sage Ranch. I believe there would be a pretty good argument in court that they indeed are the rightful owners of Sage Ranch.

2. Back when PWR entered into an agreeement for 50% interest in the property somebody at corporate seemed to fail to register the 50% ownership with the County. That may also come back to haunt them.

3. If Ronnie Strasser is indeed fed up and wants to know where all his investment money in both PWR (17M shares) and his GRB investment (5M+ shares) I believe his ecomnomic resources and company knowledge certainly would allow him to investigate corporate.

4. If the company can't pay their lawyers then things like the up front costs for Montalva become insurmountable. See below : 
"In addition, the second reason was that some projects, despite having initially qualified, did not comply with the subsequent conditions (formerly preceding conditions). This includes corporate guarantees, interconnection contracts, among others.

"The bail or “Security Amount” is one of the subsequent conditions that has caused a stir. However, according to what Energa Estratgica was able to find out, there are several amounts at stake.

1- Proposal Security $10,000/MW that is placed through a letter of credit on the same day the offer is submitted.

2- Non-refundable fees which are through bank transfer and cover interconnection studies. $225,000 for projects over 50 MW.

3- Performance Security (security amount) which is through a letter of credit and covers the risk that the project is not built and is executed after a time. The value is 50,000 $/MW.

4- Payment Guarantee or Corporate Guarantee of limited liability. The limited amount is up to 75 million per project."

That is over $80M for the first phase over Montalva. Greenbriar tried to have these fees waived but to no avail.
Conclusion- With not having any money, not having certain investors support and nothing left as incentives then Sage may end up on the block. And if Strasser is indeed pis_ed then the results may not be pretty considering his influence on both companies that are held in "a conflict of interest".
It may be the point for a new CEO, a guaranteed influx of cash and a factual case for at least moving Sage Ranch forward followed by Montalva.
Just some thoughts to rattle around.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>