Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Victoria Gold Corp T.VGCX

Alternate Symbol(s):  VITFF

Victoria Gold Corp. is a gold mining company. The Company’s flagship asset is its 100% owned Dublin Gulch property, which hosts the Eagle, Olive and Raven gold deposits along with numerous targets along the Potato Hills Trend including Nugget, Lynx and Rex Peso. Dublin Gulch is situated in the central Yukon, Canada, approximately 375 kilometers (km) north of the capital city of Whitehorse. The property covers an area of approximately 555 square kilometers and is the site of the Company's Eagle and Olive Gold Deposits. It also holds a suite of other development and exploration properties in the Yukon, including Brewery Creek, Clear Creek, Gold Dome and Grew Creek. The Eagle West target area lies as close as 500 meters northwest of the main Eagle Gold Deposit and hosts the exposures of the granodiorite. The Raven target is located at the contact zone at the extreme southeastern portion of the Nugget Stock. The Brewery Creek Project is a past producing heap leach gold mining operation.


TSX:VGCX - Post by User

Comment by SWHuskyon Aug 20, 2024 11:01am
40 Views
Post# 36187867

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Why

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WhyMaybe it's because every time they see him on site they think "Boy did you ever get ripped off?"

Are you saying PwC are a bunch of spin doctors.

imo

saddlerack wrote:

It seems unlikely that PWC could have terminated JM for cause but it does suggest incompetence. I'm just not sure who is incompetent. Is it JM, is it PWC or YTG?  There needs to be much more transparency, especially now that it's public money at play. 

As for JM, it seems that his announcement is the first time in a while that he is getting in front of the situation. Now it is up to PWC to explain why.

I'm thinking that the reason is economics. Get rid of the fat salaries, keep the technicians and start paying the fat salaries to your own people. I wonder how PWC will spin it



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>