Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Victoria Gold Corp VITFF

Victoria Gold Corp. is a gold mining company. The Company’s flagship asset is its 100% owned Dublin Gulch property, which hosts the Eagle, Olive and Raven gold deposits along with numerous targets along the Potato Hills Trend including Nugget, Lynx and Rex Peso. Dublin Gulch is situated in the central Yukon, Canada, approximately 375 kilometers (km) north of the capital city of Whitehorse. The property covers an area of approximately 555 square kilometers and is the site of the Company's Eagle and Olive Gold Deposits. It also holds a suite of other development and exploration properties in the Yukon, including Brewery Creek, Clear Creek, Gold Dome and Grew Creek. The Eagle West target area lies as close as 500 meters northwest of the main Eagle Gold Deposit and hosts the exposures of the granodiorite. The Raven target is located at the contact zone at the extreme southeastern portion of the Nugget Stock. The Brewery Creek Project is a past producing heap leach gold mining operation.


PINL:VITFF - Post by User

Post by givemeabreak1on Aug 20, 2024 1:06pm
156 Views
Post# 36188203

The answer is no!

The answer is no!A few comments on the board that make no sense.  As I recall someone seemed to indicate appointment of a receiver should have gone to government tender instead of Court Appointment.  Hopefully, they were just kidding.  For those who are familiar with gov tenders it is not a process that is geared to environmental disasters lol.  Heck it is not a process that is geared to much of anything.

Another comment was the government acted too quickly and there is no precidence for this quick action!   Again, this is an environmental disaster so hopefully we do not have too many of them so tough arguement to make.  That said,  there is alot of precedence especially in the oil fields.  The government of Albert got spanke with massive clean up bills of defunct oil companies many years ago so changed the way they approaced them.  One of those ways was to act quickly.

An example,  In August 2019 Houston notified the regulator that they were going to shut in their oil in gas operations due to financial distress.  The regulator issued an order that Houston did not comply with and by October there was a court ordered receiver appointed.....
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse