RE:So, where is the Avon Valuation report?RoyallyScrewed wrote: If the actual report is so good, why hasn't it been delivered and verified? Why would a company hold back a report that was completed 6-7 months ago? Something very fishy going on here.
Is there something Edgewater didn't like aboit it? It's funny that it somehow missed the radar of sharekolders who historically eek out all this type of information within a day or two of news being leaked or posted. I've seen the NR on at least 3 prominent websites. I don't go searching for this stuff, but there are "shareholding" admirers for Edgewater posting here who do all the ime.
Not only did Avon hold back the report for 6 months so far, but Edgewater claims that they were refused access to it. As the Shamster has poined out,
"The proprietary report remains inaccessible to both Edgewater management and our shareholders." Not surprisingly the Shamster didn't offer any explation as to why this happened. In fact, his reply was,
"This statement alone should have deterred further commentary".That's hilarious! He must think that anyone following this stock to invest, or are already invested are complete morons. If you fall into that category, what would you like to say to ShamDiego?
Shammy has shown may times that he doesn't have the ability to form an opinion or deduce a logical, probable or even possible opinion as to why something so negative or strange would have taken place... unless of course he can manage to put a positive spin on it.
In all my years of gambling on the Venture and TSX, I have never come across another company who refused to deliver a completed stock analysis report after releasing it prematurely by mistake.
Shammy thinks this is normal and wants everyone looking at this stock to just accept it as normal, as clearly expressed in his own words quoted above. There are a few names to describe that type of person trying to diminish and suppress facts that copuld adversely affect someones risk assessment, while attacking anyone bring it to the attention of investors. None of them are complimentary.
So what do I expect from ShamWow in response to this post? Well he usually starts with a presonal attack, not addressing the topic at hand, and not offering any logical explanation of the topic at hand. Historiically he also resorts to changing the subject in a 500 word essay of gobbledygook only worthy of the King of Nonsense himself.
Or he might not respond, if he has any sense of shame. LOL, highly unlikely.