RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ditch the TSXApaulson wrote: Dual class shares are common? Not really. Dual class structures are seen as negative. If they got rid of that, the stock would rise quite a bit. Are you new to this?
They could do better if they were primarily on the NYSE.
You're dense packerazz.
Dual class shares are seen as a negative??? I guess that means you wouldn't or didn't invest in Alphabet, Berkshire Hathaway, Coca-Cola or Facebook (now Meta), Molson Coors.....and many others.
Good for you!
It's a long list of "underperformers" (according to you) like Ford, Lennar, Hershey, Tyson Foods, Under Armour, UPS, Visa....
the list is from 2017 but I doubt it's changed very much....
https://www.cii.org/files/3_17_17_List_of_DC_for_Website(1).pdf
And FYI....I'm real old and I'm not "new to this". I look at the playing field and I play. I don't waste time/energy complaining about the size of the field or the rules of play. If I happen to underperform that's strickly on me...it's not the field or the rules.