RE:RE:RE:RE:No sign Nxo will trade againMaxmoe wrote: Damn1212 wrote: Im nowhere near the biggest shareholder considering they did a 2.2 M $ PP 1.5 years ago . ..
You have no idea what the vote is about so that argument holds no water.
Again lay off the posters and start commenting on the company and its actions or lack of actions.
Ps for a person holding 0 shares in Nxo you sure do post a lot LOL
Id love to see how you post on a company you own ! LoL
Ps
Nxo 0$ revenue
Nxo hasnt traded in 3.5 months and company gave us no updates
Nxo has no sales
Nxo has no capital currently to keep operating
Nxos long line of products all have failed to sell
Please comment on the above points and on what you feel is soo great about NXO that brings you back everyday to reply to every post about the company and its failures !
You're hopeless. You'll never grasp the simplest truth. You can't dictate the agenda. Why would I comment on the above points. You've covered it 1000 times. Nobody has ever disagreed they have , so far, reported no sales , no revenue, no profit ---only losses, and like every startup they must either 1)raise more capital 2) generate profits or 3) eventually go out of business . Why does someone with millions of shares focus on #3? Why object and attack anyone wanting to discuss the POSSIBILITY of #2, the best case scenario???
if you want to see my posts on my other stocks that's easy to do. I only have one username and it's the same in every platform. My largest holding is ATH. I see you have posted many, many , many 1000s of posts in every platform, with several different usernames but ALL about this ONE stock. I'd love to see how you post on ANY other company you own.
Now for my favourite part. The boundless embarrassing math predicaments you get yourself into. You have to be the largest single shareholder. It's simple algebra and deduction for me. It's easy and amusing for me to do the math. It's not critical or outlandish accusation. It's simple. If I take all the posts you've made, under all your usernames, across all platforms I can build a database of shareholding claims you've bragged about. I can refine this with claims of buying a million here, a few 100k there. Let's not forget the time out of some sort of pride and bravado, you flashed your millions for sale, very briefly, on the offering side, well above the market offer price that day. No idea why, but it helps triangulate an accurate estimate. Lastly, the last purchase which you forlornly said was to reduce your average cost to 21 cents provide another algebraic clue to solve for 'X'. Which I did, as you know, and posted it. Next, I can review sedi and sedar to find insider holdings both present and historic. There is no shareholder, or group, that holds >10% of current outstanding shares. So, the ONLY way you are NOT the single largest shareholder is if you have lied repeatedly, by a consistent order of magnitude, about how many shares your owned, how many additional shares you bought, AND ....As claimed multiple times .....that you NEVER SOLD. Because you couldn't. Because it's so illiquid. But that's another concept you struggle with.