RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:A lot of drivel from fudstersMostlyserious wrote: Go ahead. Pick one twisted fact, or provide additional facts, from your private discussions with the CEO.
Don't sell your shares. We all know that you did nothing but just buy, buy, buy. Right? Never sold a single share on a quick upswing, yet sooo happy with your investment which by now would be well under water.
Why are you here? To educate us so that we buy shares? Why do you care about some Dave or Mary so much? Why don't you get out there and tangibly help out someone in some need instead of bash people?
Thinkbigsti69 wrote: Mostlyserious wrote: To be fair and share the understanding from public documents that pumpers are not going to answer because facts are not something they are interested in discussing.
QRR still in play. The initial messaging was that they have limited resources and they have to choose how to best use them. So, QRR was put on the backburner for that as well as the abundance of material from the existing market that was cheap at that time.
Nano. In play for PYR. HPQ had paid for the technology, things did not pan out for the way they intended and they gave it back to PYR for free. Worked out for PYR, they got some money out of it from someone and still have it.
Hydrogen. Still in play. Not much work being done on it right now so that is something potential that will continue being dangled. ;-)
Thinkbig can chime in and correct anything that may be factually incorrect. You know, fact check a FUDster because that is what he does....actually never...the other way around. But this time he will help answer your questions because we are having a discussion about presentation of facts.
Twisting facts is only FUD. Way to much to correct will all your invented FUD facts. Why are you here? Oh yes to educate us so we sell our shares. LOL
You spew FUD full time. Whatever I say would be twisted by you for your FUD agenda.
We are not selling but adding. To bad for you. LOL