be out there...
Bull runz, you are either a liar or you cannot
read a chart.
You said some people paid $6 bucks a share years ago...
BS, the highest shareprice in Talisker's history was
65 cents pre-consolidation
which translates to
$3.25 post-consolidation.
Then you make another, clearly false statement...
"Meanwhile, New Gold increases their position during each share dillution"
If you can do a proper calculation then you would know that NewGold's position drops with every dilution.
If memory serves me correctly, NewGold has only bought into one placement to maintain their initial 15% purchase.
Since then, NewGold's position has been continuously diluted from an initial 15% ownership purchase of Talisker down to, what is now, slightly above 11%.
NewGold was locked for a two year period which, I believe, expired in April.
Since then NewGold has NOT bought any shares of Talisker to i crease it's ownership position.
One could reasonably deduce that if NewGold was interested in taking out Talisker that they would have at least increased their existing position at some point since April, which they clearly have not done.
(Sedar would have reflected additional accumulation by NewGold since it owns greater than 10%)
With NewGold's initial buy in of Talisker at a post-consolidation price of
$1.85/sh(.37 pre-consolidation)
it would only make sense that if they wanted to buy out Talisker that they would at least be maintaining their 15% ownership or buying shares in the open market at a fraction of the cost of their initial buy in price.
Might be time to move out of ur mom's basement.