RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:This is what Seems like you want to put all of the onus on Peter Evans. What responsibility do you attribute to the board of directors? This last financing would have had to have gone through the board as well. Right? So what's the game plan here? Get rid of Evans and the entire board? If you are insinuating Peter is in bed with MSG we would have to assume the entire board is too. Doesn't make a lot of sense. Sounds more like retaliation because you are pissed about the SP. I say give it a rest. It will play out soon enough.
Ousting the CEO will only cause nonconfidence with future investors and potential clients as the stability and reliability of the company will come into question. Not a smart move.