RE:RE:RE:RE:Some thoughts100% SM and that's why I'm only invested in TUD.
This is not an over complicated issue.
We keep seeing certain posters rehashing the same thing over ond over in an attempt to make themselves believe that their opinions will have some sort of effect on the outcome of Treaty Creek. It will not. That's wishful thinking.
Back to basics:
1) IMHO The BC Government erred in allowing SEA to continuously kick the MTT debacle down the road for way too long. They can't expect TUD management to fix an issue that was caused by too many grey areas and clearly lacking specifics and timelines.
2) TUD's exploration of Goldstorm is at a critical stage and completion of a PEA based on the newly discovered and fantastic high grade Gold cells takes priority (by far) over the botched MTT.
3) There is no deal without TUD as they are majority shareholders in Treaty Creek and have taken all the risks regarding the funding of the drilling and exploration.
4) Any Major or JV partner would never decide to build a mine behind the Mountain 1st. This defies all basic logic and comon sense even to a layman.
5) Like it or not SEA is between a rock and a hard place and have 2 choices at this point. Buy out TUD (but PEA will need to be completed for accurate stock valuation) Note that I didn't include TUO or AMK and the reasoning should be obvious. Or wait until the PEA is completed and try to force a new MTT route location.
6) After the PEA is completed TUD should call production time for Goldstorm so that the cost of further exploration of all other zones is also funded by all other partner companies.
7) 30 Moz of 1.19 g/t (or better) Gold and other minerals would be an extremely valuable Mine to start with and use the huge proceeds to fund many more years of exploration on the vast TC property.
Things are looking great for TUD shareholders!
Stockmoves1 wrote: TUD has the Clout that a 20% holder doesn't / AMK proved that ..
LONG on TUD