RE:ngcwoundedknee,
As youknowwhat also indicated for you, "Sprott" is likely to call it's primary creditor marker here with NGC.
Covenants have been broken and there is little time before "Sprott" has these puppets here milking dry NGC taking the company into CCAA proceedings.
Why else do you expect the NGC.V share price is at $0.055.
Unfrotunately, I managed to call each and every step down for the NGC.V share price.
I haven't ever sold short any equity (I don't trade on margin and never will); and yet, that was the guaranteed way to go here with NGC.
Whether you like to admit it or not, "Sprott" is representative of "THE creditor in possession" here. That Greggory Bowes "consulted" outfit (consultant my rear end; we know what you had your privately acting "intermediaries" go abot doing, as would benefit you Greggory Bowes) and Hereus Group are also creditors, although, they are definitely not calling the shots; "Sprott" is.
Sure somebody who is desperate enough to extricate from their NGC.V holding could elect to orchestrate a 100% priming , pumping and dumping on relatively low daily traded volume; and yet, what would be the catalyst allowing for even a slight movement upward from the current NGC.V share price? Rest assured, the regulatory authorities are very closely watching each and every NGC.V trade nowadays.
Perhaps NGC representatives selling the Lac des Illes processing facility and necessarily arranging for a toll processing deal with the newly controlling owner of said processing facility?
Even then, this company simply wouldn't be able to get out from under the incredible debt burden which Hugues Jacquemin, Greggory Bowes, Cam Birge and the others quite intentionally and quite "fraudulently" loaded onto the company and onto the respective equity positions of we NGC.V "minority" shareholders.
"Sprott" has something in the works; and it's likely not going to benefit we NGC "minority" equities investors in an way.