Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Atlas Salt Inc V.SALT

Alternate Symbol(s):  REMRF

Atlas Salt Inc. is a Canada-based mineral exploration company. The Company is engaged in the evaluation, exploration, development and production of industrial mineral properties in Newfoundland and Labrador. The Company’s principal asset is the Great Atlantic salt deposit project (Great Atlantic Salt Project), located in the St. George Basin of western Newfoundland. Its Gypsum Project is three kilometers (km) southwest of Great Atlantic salt deposit, which is an early-stage and open-pit production from the Ace deposit. Its Nepheline Syenite Property consists of a surface occurrence of nepheline syenite along the southern Labrador highway. The project is located approximately six km from tide water.


TSXV:SALT - Post by User

Comment by sorrensonon Sep 18, 2024 4:22pm
152 Views
Post# 36229796

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:stock exchange switcheroo?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:stock exchange switcheroo?"they're telling us NON DILUTIVE financing"

I await your evidence of the company statement   in company documents not the delusional  claims on boards by parties who amazingly only post on Salt boards...Funny that

I quote company budgets and timelines from company documents and its ":fud"   Amazing delusions 

general360 wrote:
sorrenson wrote: That is quite the rant  but all your screaming isnt changing the fact the company needs over 480 million 2024 dollars  and is 6 years from production.   Scream all you want but nothing has changed economics or time.



.
general360 wrote: I think Scottwood industries is lying to you!  they don't actually intend to buy 1.25Mt-1.5Mt/ PER YEAR. it's lies i tells ya! Lies! so is the what, at least 75M PURE PROFIT from that sale alone!??!

same goes for sandvik.  they're what, about a 25B USD company?  LIES!  smoke and mirrors!  they're going to PRETEND to offer 76 MILLION for state of the art equipment on CREDIT!

maybe the market believes this won't happen.  no respect from the market to reward patience.  what's that expression...

Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”- John Maynard Keynes.

not thrilled about the lack of market response...wonder if that's b/c of the last 4$ run up, maybe nobody believes now... can it stay this low once we get news about financing? what's it gonna take!?

bring on the permits next!  i'm guessing that's the next tidbits we'll hear about.  then financing... couple more months for both?  maybe another off-take for the rest of the intial one-ish T/yr; 1.5/2.5 already spoken for!

maybe no r-e-s-p-e-k-t b/c of the board of directors?  maybe too much retail holding and no market makers are gonna make us richy-rich? if institutions and or banks owned this you'd best believe they'd be inflating this AGAIN, just like they did last time!  head scratcher fer sure, why no speculative increase as we check off boxes!?

i still think this goes to another exchange sooner than later, then institutions can start buyin.... Mr Zephyr, what makes you go hmmmmmm about this... you know something u care to share? am i onto something?!  i dont see institutions buying on the vulture xchange..i could be wrong, but don't we at least need SP above.. ??? 1$? 5$ before buy-in? is that a general360 rule of thumb, no buying on venture, or no buying lower than $X?


Go SALT go!


TeamEddie wrote: wow you actually believe this will succeed







it's not a rant and aint noody screaming tool bucket! ... my reasoning is sound: its based on what the company is telling us they're doing.  your nay-sayin + edward sound repetitive and suggest you're the same person, or at least call into question your agenda(s).  do you have anything to offer other than disagreeing w/ anything the company says? 

no, they don't need 480M dollars... they have 76M of it squared away, don't they?  or are you going to deny that?  that leaves 400. and that includes contingency.   not so minor point.  they're telling us NON DILUTIVE financing, and so far that's exactly what it is.  can you admit that?

it's also not 6 years is it?  we're nearing the end of 2024, about to roll into 2025 and start digging, and 2030 is production?  so isn't that 5 years? 2025-2030?  and it's not like this was stretched out like they were saying 3-4 years and now all of a sudden its 6?!  can you admit that too?  the schedule in the FS started last year, so the "delay" pushes this out to 2030.

might as well say we need 800M and it'll take 10 years, you wanna disagree with everything?! sheesh...  you nay-sayers are all SALTY, just coming everywhere and spewing fear, uncertaintly and doubt - FUD - with no counter arguments, nothing to address ANYTHING... 
but hey, u do u, FUD AWAY!

  
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>