RE:RE:NEW UPDATE "1. Cavco contract has nothing to do with Sage Ranch project. It was meant for CORDERO RANCH Sage Ranch houses will not be manufactured home , everything is still the same .
FYI, Cavco is not a contract it is a Memorandum of Understanding. Very big difference.
- Then why mention they have a California manufacturing facility? (which they don't)
- Then why mention that Sage Ranch units were part of available sites?
Perhaps "somebody" can provide information related to the current status for submitting plans,considering the previous Master Plan is outdated and land requirements have changed. Pretty tough having homes being built within a year when there is no approvals or infrastructure in place at all.
2. And about the litigation, actually Greenbriar sued him first for 1 millione dollar , then this person filed a counter sue to GRB. litigation is baseless and a small claim for around 140k$ , those small claims happens every second in America, nobody cares.
The million dollar litigation will disappear and shareholders will pay the $140,000 + lawyers fees for both sides. Unfortunately the CEO apparently failed to mention the latest filings related to the case. Far more interesting, to say the least. Requiring a "protective order" shows a lot related to what's happening in the legal background.
3. There are many lager buyers right now, and they are willing to buy anyone's positions including Strasser's .
They must be the buyers on the US side selling shares from a high of $3.00 to the current trading price of $0.02. I believe finding someone to purchase 37M shares of PWR (in the next (6) days) is a higher priority.
4. Montalva project is also made huge progress as well.
Since it has been over a decade and still no PPOA approval from the PREB. Let alone the FOMB. Maybe third time's a charm.
5.finally for the elephant in the room , the water litigation. i did some research and I wish i can legally tell you how soon it is gonna be fully settled , (but if I am a gamblers i will bet it will be fully settled in the company and city's best interests in the near future. )
As the City and the District are currently in negotiations to try and get the RUWMP planning study reactivated the water litigation is in "the future" indeed. Considering your previous timeframe has over doubled since your last offering, I do take your research with a grain of salt. Particularily if you can't "legally" provide the information. Certainly hope it wasn't your last legal letter opinion creator.
I know fear is spreading with rumors, sadly all those misinformations are just hurting the small shareholders. Larger SH with correct information are taking advantage to buy cheaper shares. As yourself being "a substantial shareholder" owning less than 0.002% of the company market cap. And by the way, there are actually an extremely small amount of shares being purchased and held. The vast majority are between CIBC and RBC (through anonymous) along with a mere few traders trying to make a buck on penny flips.
Perhaps it was the misinformation you presented previously, considering the vast majority of my information is based on presented documents and not unsubstantiated rumours that can't be legally provided.
Related to your comment about Chris Harvey, "If you follow Jeff's instagram you would know there are not just business partners but actually good friends." Ronnie Strasser mentioned the following, "I've known Jeff for 6 years. We are good friends - actually great friends...."
How has that friendship panned out?