RE:Great post from ceoSo, why has it taken so long to publish GEN1 and GEN2 results for 150 cycles that were literally off the chart (bottom of the chart)? Why were GEN1 and GEN2 early results played up to be game changers? Can't remember if they used the "disruptive" term like they did for the FSR.
Bcont, if you can help reconcile this 2,000 cycle testing with the announced results not yet exceeding 200 cycles, that would be appreciated. I think these kids of posts and things like Nanograf will just need to be answered in the videos. Not sure that these kinds of things are doing BT any favors.