RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:as usual patience is Mostlyserious wrote: Before they announced the purchase of a battery tester, one would have obtained a general understanding from the news releases that they had contracted a university to perform some aspects of testing or evaluation of the testing results.
I don't understand the statement "Our innovative use of silicone monoxide allows us to build batteries that can be charged over 2000 cycles, breaking longstanding barriers in materials degradation."
Is this a forward-looking statement based on some modelling or scientific hypothesis or have they actually charged some of this material over 2000 cycles? GEN1 and GEN2 were degrading significantly before reaching 200 cycles. GEN3 has published 200 cycle results.
Thank you for that info mostly! That must have taken them years to do 2000 cycles using a second party! I wonder how long it will take them to do 2000 cycles now that they have their own equipment?