WHAT DO I THINK ?Amarillo Grande
- surface uranium
- easily ammendable
- host rock ( 49% uranium bearing ( pebbled rocks ) may not be factored )
- junior could dev more Amarillo on owm ------> vs jv ( 50/50 then 80/20 )
- Amarillo has 2 other surface uranium zones
- Anit has good showings
- Santa similar
Chihuidos
- staked 100% owned
- press mentions basin and.... marine and continental sedimentary sequence
- sedimentary could mean purple shales = if potassium reacted to water turned purple
= what precipitated ? pretty dark purples and greens. I'm not seeing any precipitates.
= Potsssium reacts violently with water
= if uranium were present in open range purple ( shales )
= would uranium not have shown itself with redox and change of color - precipitate out ?
= if speaking of basin - green calcretes = could harbor uranium but....
= did geos verify uranium at surface before staking ?
= or..... is bsk relying on O & G deep,,,, very deep uranium findings by O & G reports ?
= deep drilling will affect junior with share structure vs finding at surface uranium claims
= inturn affect potential jv with armarillo
= deep drilling racks up shares keeps bsk value low while jv works armarillo over time.
Corcovo
- pale peachy sands
- close to deep peachy sands ( adjacent west zones ) but not apart of bsk's claims.
- government of Mendoza has launched a new vehicle to support development in the province
- $400k + 1% + $500k to vendor if advanced to production
= pale peachy ores ( granites / felds )?
- pale = diluted ores
- versus heavy pinks west / adjacent.
= Geo's could do better
= Surface showings ( large ) with visual redoxing is needed
= if a new project was massive with visuals + revised jv terms for Armarillo
= very strong future
vs
= new claims / weak uranium showings + 80/20 armarillo jv = need i say more.
Test Chihuidos basin for surface uranium
Test Corvoco
= if both are weak drop both ------> find something that's massive with visuals
= if investors can see it - if massive -----> a given.
Cheers...