RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Tesla Cathode Plant UpdateAgreed thanks for the engagement @TommyNickels.
I also believe Nano has some very notable process technology differentiators compared to Tesla CAM process technology.
Namely:
One clear sign that Nano One Pot process technology is better than Tesla’s is the fact that Tesla still needs huge roller hearth kilns for calcination.
Nano has repeatedly commented that huge/long roller hearth kilns for calcination takes up a massive plant footprint compared to rotary hearth kilns (which can be used for One Pot calcination).
And huge/long roller hearth kilns are extremely expensive compared to rotary hearth kilns (which can be used for One Pot calcination).
And most importantly, huge/long roller hearth kilns consume vastly more energy than fast firing rotary hearth kilns (which can be used for One Pot calcination).
Perhaps these are sufficient to differentiate our One Pot process and compete with Tesla.