Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Blue Sky Uranium Corp V.BSK

Alternate Symbol(s):  BKUCF

Blue Sky Uranium Corp. is a uranium and vanadium exploration company. The Company controls more than 480,000 hectares with the potential for uranium resources in Rio Negro, Chubut, Neuquen, and Mendoza provinces. Its projects include the Amarillo Grande Project, the Sierra Colonia Project, the Tierras Coloradas Project, Cerro Parva Project, Corcovo Project, and Chihuidos Project. The Company's flagship Amarillo Grande Project is located in central Rio Negro province, in the Patagonia region of southern Argentina. The Corcovo Project is comprised of two adjacent exploration properties totaling approximately 20,000 ha at the northeastern edge of the Neuquen basin. The Chihuidos project is comprised of six exploration property units totaling almost 60,000 hectares located 60 kilometers (km) west of Anelo city. The Sierra Colonia project includes 100% ownership of more than 28,470 hectares in the central-eastern part of Chubut Province.


TSXV:BSK - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Oct 13, 2024 1:44pm
34 Views
Post# 36264650

POLYPHOSPHATES

POLYPHOSPHATESSimple Phosphate
World Nuclear Association -
May 16, 2024Rock phosphate deposits contain many million tonnes of uranium, which may be extracted as a by-product of making fertilizers

Polyphosphate
polyphosphate is a salt or ester of polymeric oxyanions formed from tetrahedral PO structural units linked together by sharing oxygen atoms. Polyphosphates can adopt linear or a cyclic structures. In biology, the polyphosphate esters ADP and ATP are involved in energy storage

The most common ammonium polyphosphate fertilizers have a N-PO-KO (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) composition of 10-34-0 or 11-37-0.

Potassium
World Nuclear Association -
May 16, 2024The uranium mineralisation is usually carnotite (hydrated potassium uranium vanadium oxide).

What does potassium decay into ?

Potassium-40 (40K) is a radioactive isotope of potassium which has a long half-life of 1.25 billion years. It makes up about 0.012% (120 ppm) of the total amount of potassium found in nature.

Potassium-40 undergoes three types of radioactive decay. In about 89.28% of events, it decays to calcium-40 (40Ca) with emission of a beta particle, an electron) with a maximum energy of 1.31 MeV and an antineutrino. In about 10.72% of events, it decays to argon-40 (40Ar) by electron capture (EC), with the emission of a neutrino and then a 1.460 MeV gamma ray.[Note 1] The radioactive decay of this particular isotope explains the large abundance of argon (nearly 1%) in the Earth's atmosphere, as well as prevalence of 40Ar over other isotopes. Very rarely (0.001% of events), it decays to 40Ar by emitting a positron+) and a neutrino.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-40


Monphosphates, Polyphosphates, Potassium
= Thorium, Uranium

Interesting reading how potassium decays to, calcium, argon
Could elevated argon emissions act the pathfinder for uranium deposits ?
Or.... too latent with radioactive decay ?

Argon price October 2024 and outlook (see chart below).
Europe:
US$0.53/KG,
US $530 / tonne


I also came across ( sulphur's role ) in polyphosphates ) and uranium.
It too plays a part.


So.... Ivana's wastern drills were dusters ?
Why ?
Could it be..... drills were testing nonredox areas ?
                         drills testing soft soils not hardrock redox ?

Quick fix ?
Test Laguna Indio Salar.
Seems the hardrock ( dark patches ) on eastern bluffs have the redox.
Redox ( tellow, green, white ) enters Laguna Indio.
If Indio has Uranyls = Uranium
Then... uranium source = dark patches ( hardrock lenses ) 

Former post, ( while back )
i mentioned how potassium changes to purple..
Many of the SA rocks ( everywhere ) throughout Provinces are,
Green Crystal
Purple

Each of these redox to, lime green, yellow.
Potential Carnotite Uranium.

Take for instance, Chihuidos ranges, bluffs.
Heavy purple sediment lenses ( 150m thick )
Surely these bluffs have seen many eain seasons over millenial.
If purple.... suggests open face potassium bluffs have reacted = changed to purple
If..... no color transitions to.... lime green, yellow would this not suggest uranium
has not precipitated - therefore - non uranium besring ?
Keep in mind - potassium decays to calcium.
Caustic alkai to assist transitioning of, uranium.


Is Argentina similar to Colombia ?
Chaproned exploration ?
lol

I'm hoping Geo's call the shots.
And, Argentine assisted help act the part of, help.
Which segways... prepping samples and - pulps.

Testing the sediments and evaporates of,
Laguna Indio
Laguna Tres Picos
Dark Patch sediment lenses
= would reveal lots   ( versus simple soft ores of Ivana )

Let's play suppose,
suppose eastern bluffs ( visual redox ) fed Indio
suppose Indio salar contained  uranium sediments and uranyls.
4300m L x 2000m W x 2m deep sediments x 2.5 ore weight
x 0.02% U x 2200 ( pound conversion )
8600 t
x 2200
= 18,920,000  lbs

Like another Ivana

Which begs....could current Ivana been a small salar or apart of,
Laguna Tres ?

If true... Laguna Tres would / could have similar sediments.

Let's go one more....
Laguna Tres and Laguna Indio and current Ivana were all adjoined at one time.
See what i'm seeing ?

Ivana went dry but kept it's carnotite intact. ( secondary deposit )
Suppose Tres and Indio went dry ?
Geo comes along tests dried up salar sediments and.....
same results as.... Ivana.

Only difference ?
Tres and Indio have not dried up.

Question to ponder ?
Was Ivana once apert of Laguna Tres ?
What if Laguna Tres engulfed entire area including Ivana and Indio ?
Would sediment minerology - be same throughout ?
Now factor.... surrounding hardrock lenses ( dark patches in full swing redox )

Hence.... testing eastern redox and dark patches.
Test salars.
Eastern drills in my opinion ( 2 blue straight  lines ) missed big time.



Cheers....


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54061746476_ac9eb7a275_b.jpg




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>