Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Post by MarcusAon Oct 20, 2024 4:43am
222 Views
Post# 36273517

What BC can expect from Sea

What BC can expect from SeaFordster and Stockmoves,

I like your reaction to a recent post, but here is another take on the matter:

All this talk about what Sea "expects" from Tud, what Tud has to "prove" to them, what conditions Tud has to met and so on is deceptive, at best.

All that matters is that Sea can be expected to play by the book, that is to act according to the articles layed out in the LoO.
And this includes a reference to Sec. 50 of the Land Act. I recently quoted this, because I had a look trying to find in the Land Act what Sea and some posters here claim: that Tud now has to do this or that.
I could not find it. They Land Act does not mention words like "PEA".

Hence, to pretend that Sea can dictate the terms and conditions of a possible way foreward is utter nonsence. Mind your buisness or rahter: try to mine your own turf.

Does this make sense to you?



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>