RE:RE:SEA's worse Nightmare"When SEA starts tunneling, the mineralization that comes out of the tunnels is stockpiled for TUD because TUD has the mineral rights. So nothing is lost."
Lets take a look at this, csk. From the 2020 SEA feasability study, SEA is planning for the MTT to be twin tunnels of 4.28m x 5.10m dimension. Lets assume these tunnels cut across ~1km of strike length of the Goldstorm deposit (could be more, could be less, I will let you come up with an appropriate estimation for this if you disagree).
Volume of the tunnels = material Tudor would receive
4.28m * 5.10m * 1000m *2 tunnels = 43,656 m3
From Tudor's 43-101, a density of 2.81 g/cm3 = tonnes/m3
43,656 m3 * 2.81 tonnes/m3 = 122,673 tonnes of material.
The tonnage of the Goldstorm deposit is 730,200,000 tonnes (730 million tonnes).
So Tudor would receive 122,673 tonnes out of a deposit size of 730 million or approximately 0.01%.
Now, CSK, seeing as how you have stated nothing would be lost, can you please come up with a reasonable estimate for how much volume around the tunnels that any reasonable mine plan would have to concede to not interfere with the tunnel infrastucture. Think about both open pit and underground block caving mine plans.
If you state that nothing is lost, please consider a rational thought process on what that might entail. Perhaps that is too challenging for you.