Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Signal Gold Inc ANXGD


Primary Symbol: T.SGNL

Signal Gold Inc. is a Canada-based gold development company. The Company is engaged in advancing the wholly owned Goldboro Project in the Canadian mining jurisdiction of Nova Scotia. The Goldboro Project is an advanced exploration and gold development project located approximately 175 kilometers (km) northeast of the city of Halifax, 60 km southeast of the town of Antigonish, and 1.6 km north of the village of Goldboro, on the eastern shore of Isaac’s Harbour, in Guysborough County, Nova Scotia, Canada. The Company has consolidated approximately 28,525 hectares (285 km2) of prospective exploration land in the Goldboro Gold District.


TSX:SGNL - Post by User

Comment by andre171on Oct 25, 2024 2:46pm
111 Views
Post# 36282536

RE:RE:Merger DD: Pre-Merger Financing Is Good For SGNL

RE:RE:Merger DD: Pre-Merger Financing Is Good For SGNL
DoumDiDoum wrote: Now that we know that both financings were over subscribed, if we plug the new numbers in the calculations I suggested earlier, the new numbers give the following calculations:

SGNL will have close to 118.9M extra shares, for a total of 373.9M shares after the deal. NEXG, now that the FT offering has been increased to 10M shares, would have a total 86.21M shares post-merge. SGNL shareholders will then add 46.51M shares (factoring in the 0.1244) out of the 132.72M shares for the newly merged company which represents 35%. At today’s NEXG's market cap of $61.73M, that represents a market cap of (If X is SGNL MC then X=0.35×(61.73+X))=$33.24M for a 13 cents share price.

I still think that buying shares on the market is quite good for new comers and existing shareholders that cannot participate in the financing. The 13 cents today is even good for warrants holder if the merged company keeps the same market cap bottom than currently.

I did add some more yesterday, selling my position in MAE to swing trade in SGNL, as I saw my 8 cents bid filled just before the pop.


DoumDiDoum wrote: During my DD, I tried to make sense of the Transaction Terms. It is proposed that SGNL shareholders will get 0.1244 share of NEXG for every SGNL share. At current market caps for both companies (October 15):
  • $57.15M market cap with 76.2M shares for NEXG
  • $23M market cap with 255M shares for SGNL
It means that NEXG has 71.3% of the combined market cap combination ($80.15M) and SGNL has 28.7%.

The transaction terms also allow both companies to raise capital pre-merge, at the following conditions (I'm rounding a bit for simplification):
  • SGNL can add 75M shares to their float with the option of adding 37M more for a total of 112M extra shares.
  • NEXG can add 6.3M shares to their float with the option of adding 3.1M more for a total of 9.4M extra shares.
These conditions allow SGNL to increase their ownership of the merged company if they do well in their financing. Let's prove it with two scenarios:

Scenario 1 : Financing Offers Are Both Fully Subscribed

If concurrent financings are fully subscribed (6.3M shares for NEXG and 75M shares for SGNL), SGNL float would be 330M shares and NEXG float would be 82.5M shares pre-merge.  SGNL shareholders get 0.1244 NEXG shares, meaning that 41M (330M x 0.1244) shares would be added to the 82.5M NEXG shares for a total of 123.5M shares post-merging. SGNL shareholders will then have 33% of the merged company and NEXG 67%. 33% of the combined market caps at NEXG current market cap means that SGNL market cap should be at (If X is SGNL MC then X
=0.33×(57.15+X)) $28.4M for a 11 cents share price. Thus, if someone thinks that both companies will fully subscribe their financing, buying the SGNL's NFT shares at 8.7 cents is quite a deal! Even buying at market price below 10.5 cents seems to be a fair deal.

Scenario 2 : Financing Offers Are Both Over-subscribed Using The Additional 50% Shares

It would mean 9.4M extra shares for NEXG for a total of 85.6M shares and 112M extra shares for SGNL for a total of 367M shares, adding 45.6M shares post-merging. Using the same calculations than above, SGNL shareholders will have 45.6M out of 131.3M shares for 34.7% of the company. Using current NEXG market cap, that would mean that SGNL market cap should be at (If X is SGNL MC then X
=0.347×(57.15+X)) $30.4M for a 12 cents share price.

Using these two scenarios, it’s easy to understand that if someone must pick only one of the two financing to participate in, it’s better to participate in SGNL’s one. However, for existing SGNL shareholders, you must add 30% more shares to your current position if you do not want to be diluted and benefit from this leverage.

What do you think? Are my calculations make sense?



Very interesting considerations, but I don't totally agree with you. In fact, your calculation erases the lower valuation of SGNL compared with NEXG. For me, after the operation, each “new entity” NEXG share based on current prices (and therefore current capitalizations, although I would have preferred Enterprise Values) would be worth 61.73M ( cap NEXG) +21.68 ( cap SGNL) + 18.35M (contribution of the 2 “dilution financing”) = 101.76M/132.72 = 0.767 CAD per “new NEXG” share. What do you think? If it's better, we could exchange ideas by private message, as my poor English is undoubtedly a problem for longer thought development, and this would save further unhelpful interventions. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>