Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

American Creek Resources Ltd V.AMK

Alternate Symbol(s):  ACKRF

American Creek Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based junior mineral exploration company, which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, principally for precious metal deposits. The Company’s projects include Treaty Creek and Austruck-Bonanza. The Treaty Creek Project covers approximately 114 square km in the Skeena Mining District of northern British Columbia and is situated approximately 70 km north of Stewart. The Austruck-Bonanza Property is located within the Kamloops Mining Division 53 kilometers north-west of the city of Kamloops in south central British Columbia. The Austruck-Bonanza Property is underlain by Devonian to Triassic Harper Ranch formation comprised of fine grade sedimentary rocks including mudstone and shale and includes basaltic volcanics. The Company holds 100% interest in the Austruck-Bonanza Property and 20% interest in the Treaty Creek project.


TSXV:AMK - Post by User

Comment by LonghandStrongon Oct 29, 2024 1:13am
69 Views
Post# 36286206

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Tokens outstanding???

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Tokens outstanding???What do either of those points have to do with a contention that block cave = two tunnels?   The point made by the poster was that TC didnt require tunnels.  My counterpoint was that it's been discussed that block cave was a potentially good method to extract TC deep stock works, requiring in turn, two tunnels for TC.   

1. Of course there is no formal mine plan, we aren't even at PEA.   
2. No one cares what you hold in your PF

Pivoting is not a debate tool used by anyone beyond about grade 8.   Grow up.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>