RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Status Quo?Trader155 wrote: Well if you say so, it must be true. I meant this is the internet.
Why don't you try doing some research to back up your statements
I find using an evidence based approach works-it helped me identify this dud when science first promoted it on VPTs board
I called that stock 3 years ago as a dud and ended up there when old dog a promoter on VPT came onto HUGE and promoted that there
I called HUGE years ago as well
Sk there is a pattern
i called the duds , and found new ones when promoters pump stocks on other boards
Git any other ones for me to look into
btw-read the posts it's all there
or if you are lazy go on the boards and ask your pumper colleagues
it's all based in fact
You however-distort, deflect and lie, forming new aliases when you get categorically shamed for such egregious behaviour
Yiur mother would be proud
Now come on and say you don't care, insult others for making a word salad etc
Hows it feel to look in the mirror pal
lol