RE:Merger DD : NEXG and SGNL Financial Situation you choose to ignore the non current assets because they are pretty subjective in nature....
but sometimes in the past you have used them.
are you ignoring them now because besides the $2 million in receivables by NEXG that you ignored, and besides the $4.2 million that NEXG raised July 2 you ignored, and besides using $20 million for SGNL's debt that you used while everything else was in CDN dollars (so really $28 million to compare apples to apples), is it because it no longer suits your argument?
Why do you sometimes think that all assets are important when it works for your flawed arguments, but other times say that they are not important?
I'm just trying to figure out what parts of your books are worth paying attention to.