Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Knight Therapeutics Inc T.GUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  KHTRF

Knight Therapeutics Inc. is a specialty pharmaceutical company. The Company’s principal business activity is developing, acquiring, in-licensing, out-licensing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing pharmaceutical products in Canada, Latin America and select international markets. It finances other life sciences companies and secures product distribution rights for Canada and select international markets. The Company invests in life sciences venture capital funds whereby the Company may receive preferential access to healthcare products for Canada and select international markets. It develops pharmaceutical products, including those to treat neglected tropical and rare pediatric diseases. The portfolio consists of pharmaceutical products with molecules and includes both in-licensed products such as Lenvima, Cresemba, Halaven, Trelstar, Akynzeo, Ambisome, Minjuvi, Imvexxy as well as products owned by Knight such as Exelon and Impavido.


TSX:GUD - Post by User

Comment by gudisgoodon Nov 07, 2024 11:44am
280 Views
Post# 36301206

RE:RE:Unimpressive Q3 - Still Waiting

RE:RE:Unimpressive Q3 - Still Waiting
I'm with you. Although an uneventful quarter in terms of business development, it was a solid quarter in terms of results, and aligns with the financial guidance given earlier.

We knew there would be an increase in operating expenses which, as I understand, are all building for future sales, and they were also included in previous financial guidance. The new launches are only slowly getting started in their first year -- Imvexxy, for instance, is only at $1.3M in the first three quarters of the year (although half of that was in Q3 which gives you an idea of the growth rate), so it takes a while for these new products to grow and the first year does not make a big impact.

And the costs also include preparations for products still unreleased (nine products are expected to be launched in 2025 in at least one country!).

Even the financial assets were not big disappointments this time… I mean, we actually got some positive news there with Synergy.

Lenvima is, of course, negative news. In the earnings call, Samira said “immaterial this year” and “not significant next year” about the impact of Lenvima if I remember correctly. By that time, we’ll have other products making up for it. It looked worse in the report.

The only positive about the market reaction is the company will be able to continue share buybacks at cheaper levels. But, agreed, I'm a little bit surprised by the reaction as well. Is there something that changed the market’s view of the future of the company?

The other negative news, but also something that we were quite aware of before the report, was currency, which will continue to fluctuate.

Then again, with such low trading volumes and a small market cap, it doesn’t take much / many people to change their minds for there to be a negative reaction.

By the way, Samira said 18 products in the pipeline if I remember correctly, although I’ll check this later. If I’m counting the pipeline right, I see 16 products, out of which one is Rembre, so it’s more like 15 products. Did she get it wrong or what was she referring to?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>