RE:RE:What would be the minimum revenue amount on the financials Oh another massif point I forgot to mention. The share price stays range bound by the share price financings and if any trigger prices for warrants. The institutions have been comfortable financing at higher prices through the last few cycles now. This will continue until production revenue becomes a metric for this stock. Please forgive me for that massif omission. The mbroe-ic spelling of massive became a distraction.
g
gilver wrote: That's a reasonable argument if the share price iss as based on revenue when it clearly is not at this point. The share price really still hovers around the premise of this stock's near future opportunities and the industrial sector that it is in. However, any l production revenue reported would be a further derisling and the share price would advance even higher than now with the expectation of even better numbers next year. However, Poet is not a revenue company yet so your argument of any revenue disappointment is still bashing this stock by pushing the cart before the horse in my opinion. There is a massif connection though that I spotted. Someone who trolls nearly my every post spells massive in the same way you do. Gotcha! Lmso.
g
oldtrouf wrote: Next week for this to hold 5 bucks CDN? 2 million? 5 million? The market cap is about 400 million. There is a massif disconnect here. All I know if it is zero, there will be a severe price to pay for months to come. I am talking 40 percent or more. No amount of samples or prototypes or collaborations or trade shows or promotional videos will ever move this up again. This company has been around almost 15 years and is no longer a "start up" . The point of no return is here now. Every decade long bagholder is at the breaking point. The BS days are officially over.