RE:The cost that's lostOf course you have to go back 3 years to when the market manipulators cranked the SP up to $12+ ...
Why don't you go back to 2011-2012 when I first bought @ $0.17 per share....
Did that represent a massive increase ?..
@ $12+ per share ....
Or should I say a massive " opportunity cost ". ?????
Of course you would love to see people sell just before the SP starts to climb on the back of the real progress that has been made since 3 years ago when the drosrite recovery sales and the waste disposal systems sold to the USA Navy aircraft carriers were the main drivers of Pyrogenesis plasma technologies.....
Today there are a dozen markets that Pyrogenesis is
about to enter and likely dominate with their new gamechanger technologies that are desperately needed....
You are desperate to get cheap shares....
Don't bother replying , I'm putting you on ignore with the other fudsters....
uncleron is always right !.. cheers
Toppert1 wrote: While people here lament their losses, the vast majority here don't even consider the additional very real cost that is their opportunity cost.
A very terse explanation of opportunity cost is: "the value of the best alternative that is given up when a choice is made."
I'll give an example.
If someone had invested $10,000 in an S&P ETF three years ago this day, it would be worth $12,316 now.
Someone who invested $10,000 in Pyrogenesis three years ago has $1,337 left.
Even the staid old boring Royal Bany of Canada would be worth $12,932 today, and would have paid about $1450 in dividends over the period as well.
Sell this pig.
It's going down.