RE:RE:RE:PromotersGrahamB wrote: Melida wrote: Okay then and to answer your question, it better aligns them with GAAP. It is not some fancy way for Pyro to show a better gross margin.
So, what did you learn by supporting the poster with multiple identities?
Yet your post indicated that there was some real improvements in the business operations. Do you have any evidence that the costs that they did reduce were sustainable, versus one one time events. Also, recognizing that the margin now is significantly reduced and closer to the existing margins. How do you justify that then, based on what you said below, which seems to contradict what you were saying here.
"One final comment. In Q3 Pyro did a very good job of getting its costs down without negatively effecting operations. And it has gotten its gross margin back over 40%. That's a fact and that's significant."
And by significantly reduced, if you read my other post where I recalculate the margins adjusting for the amortization , , the argument about them actually improving here is questioned.