RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Holy cr*pTOCKY8008 wrote: GrahamB,
You are not accurate in your statement : " you clearly guaranteed that the stock would hit five dollars several years ago, when in fact the opposite has happened."
In fact it's totally false.
Per your post
GrahamB Yajne made his prediction Dec 13, 2020. The stock price then was around $3.40.
January 21 2021 The SP reached $ 5.68.
Less than a month later Feb 17 2021 the SP peaked at $12.14
Anybody not taking profit back then was a fool to some degree.
TOCKY8008 GrahamB wrote: Yajne wrote: ...it seems I hit a bit of a nerve GrahamB that led to an essay of a response? Your attempt to call folks out for deflecting?.....YOU continually deflect the fact that YOU own nothing here and yet YOU spend a lot of time here...trying to save us?
I would say that I had a bit of a nerve with you, buddy. He reported my post in which I indicated, that you were clearly wrong in what you were saying, misunderstanding different time zones, failing to acknowledge your post where you clearly guaranteed that the stock would hit five dollars several years ago, when in fact the opposite has happened. What credibility can you have, when all you do is make assessments which are wrong and insult others?
Actually you would need to read the whole post to read his quote and my response-but it was labelled off topic. Funny the rest of the discussions after arent and are allowed. Anyway go back and read his prediction it was that it would close the year week above t,o -in 2020. That never happened. As you point out in 2021 it did spike up briefly, then began its decline down 9o+% (He has made other erroneous predictions about other stocks -again would be off topic here-but the point remains.) He never predicted that brief price movement with PYR-read the post your self and the other ones. Also no advice on buying and selling precisely at the peak was given. Nor is that given here. Cherry picking using things that happenned is easy-not going forward-none of the pumpers have been right in the direction that matters Thats the point. In retrospect