Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Uranium Energy Corp UEC

Uranium Energy Corp. is a uranium mining company. It advances its In-Situ Recovery (ISR) mining uranium projects in the United States and conventional projects in Canada. It offers two production ready ISR hub and spoke platforms in South Texas and Wyoming. These two production platforms are anchored by operational central processing plants and served by seven U.S. ISR uranium projects. Additionally, it has diversified uranium holdings, including uranium portfolios of North American warehoused U3O8; an equity stake in Uranium Royalty Corp., and a Western Hemisphere pipeline of resource stage uranium projects. The Texas Hub and Spoke Project includes Hobson Central Processing Plant (CPP), Burke Hollow, Goliad, Palangana, and Salvo. The Wyoming Asset Hub and Spoke In-Situ Recovery Project includes Christensen Ranch and Irigaray (Willow Creek), Moore Ranch, Ludeman, Allemand-Ross, and others. It also owns Sweetwater Plant, Red Desert Uranium Project and Green Mountain Uranium Project.


NYSEAM:UEC - Post by User

Comment by GSTbay1060on Dec 19, 2024 8:42am
38 Views
Post# 36369899

RE:RE:RE:Message to UEC

RE:RE:RE:Message to UEC

UEC would argue they had no malicious intent. Their stance would have been why not wait to see if the vote passed for the sale. Then put forward your concerns to the court. Doing it before the shareholders vote would have looked like they were trying to manipulate the vote. You can make the argument any way you want?? Should they have filed before or after the vote?? They must have had legal counsel?? Just my thoughts.. Please keep us up to speed with your investigation!! 

glta
dyodd

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>