Is rht kept alive simply for mom & dad?I often wonder why rht is keeping up this charade.
Why not fess up and let us collect our tax losses? My best guess: it's for Lisa's parents. Lisa issued options to her parents so they could in turn exercise them and thus provide rht with operating cash (classic gypsy swap). Lisa has never shown any respect for investors or shareholders but she likely feels some responsibility for getting her parents involved. How much have they sunk into their daughter's pipe dream? Perhaps keeping rht (barely) alive is her only possible hope to make things right with her parents? Lisa won me over years ago when I participated in a small pp. I never dreamed it would come to this. I know I'm not the only one. GLTA