RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Nugget coin Which of his predictions have been wrong so far?
1. He identified the token subscription facility GEM to Cunningham correctly (and quickly). He worked to explain properly to the board how it worked. He pointed out the nuanced language and provided opinion that it was misleading. This so far has been accurate as many posters on this board still feel that the subscription facility is an approved financing commitment, like a car loan pre-approval, lol.
2. He provided evidence via links to hundreds of millions of dollars of similar facilities promoted, resulting in short term SP bumps, but unfulfilled and hypothesized that it was all a bit of a "flump". Not proven yet, but Dec 31 we will see, tick tock.
3. He researched and provided links to cunningham and associated entities, showing meagre market cap pink profiles, and hypothesized that they did not have the horsepower to complete. Notnproven yet but we will see, again tick tock
4. He hypothesized that there would be some bumps in share price based on the news, that many would sell at the peak making some $. Accurate, that's what I did! Sell the news. If insiders to cunningham and or gem did this, and or if the deal doesn't close, and or if their was never any ability or intention to, he further hypothesized that this was the "flump". This is not yet proven, but Dec 31 if no close, those that held will or at least should start demanding info on this....
5. He hypothesized that the vote would pass, but that the deal wouldn't close as no money. So far partly accurate, as vote approved. While not yet closed, the second part not yet accurate, but Dec 31 fast approaches.
6. He hypothesized that AMK would drag it out beyond 31 and that this would keep the flump alive. Not yet proven, time will tell
7. He hypothesized that eventually after no more ability to practically drag out that deal would be cancelled by AMK BOD. Not yetnproven, time will tell
8. He hypothesized on cancellation that SP would TANK. Not yet proven, but again, tick tock
9. He hypothesized that on this tank that AMK.would need to do a big raise to pay the legal and that this would trigger hard questions/ litigation. Not yet proven, tick tock
10. He hypothesized that the "sheeple" (his words) on this board would then defend the cancellation, say the deal was too cheap, and move back to talk of PEA, pivots, gold price, seabridge conspiracy etc.
I got to tell you, some of his hupothesis have lready come true and of the ones that haven't, the end of the year deadline is fast approaching and frankly, in my opinion, they seem like the most likely outcome to me.
I'm also for one super glad as I sit today for Larry. His early op9bions were compell8ng enough for me to sell. Not ATH, but a bunch as high as .35. I made a small fortune. If he's wrong, I've got some TUD hedge to pick up a bit more and soothe me a little. If he's right, well hot diggedy, I'm on the right side of a sell point for once lol. Plus, the spread between my sells and a potential .43, Almost worth it for the fun it will be to make fun of (Larry's term) all you silly steeple.