Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Madison Pacific Properties Inc T.MPC

Alternate Symbol(s):  MDPCF | T.MPC.C

Madison Pacific Properties Inc. is a Canada-based company, which owns, manages and develops commercial real estate assets. These industrial, retail, residential and office assets are located in British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario. The Company’s investment portfolio comprises 55 properties with approximately 1.9 million rentable sq. ft. of industrial and commercial space and a 50% interest in seven multi-family rental properties with a total of 219 units. Approximately 91.25% of available space within the industrial and commercial investment properties is leased and within the multi-family residential properties, 98.2% is leased. Its development properties include a 50% interest in the Silverdale Hills Limited Partnership which owns approximately 1,405 acres of primarily residential designated development lands in Mission, British Columbia. Its portfolio includes 1919 W 8th Vancouver, British Columbia and 1873 Adanac St. Vancouver, British Columbia.


TSX:MPC - Post by User

Post by undervalueon Dec 26, 2024 12:39pm
54 Views
Post# 36377723

Nelson Street politics

Nelson Street politics

As i mentioned political cover for Loftus Village.


Horn said the type of redesignation requested hasn’t been a hot topic during the OCP review and there's significant demand for small lot rural development. 

“I just don't like the idea of making people have to come out and fight for their neighbourhood repeatedly. And that's what ultimately swung me out of this idea of … bringing [this] to the public hearing. I've been through it and I think that unless a community has been sort of earmarked for future development in that way or unless that's a real hot topic within the review process, there's no compelling reason to put people through it again. Shouldn't have to sleep with one eye open in order to live in a neighbourhood.”

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>