GREY:BIOAF - Post by User
Post by
InitiumMMXXIIIon Jan 03, 2025 8:14pm
92 Views
Post# 36387030
Where are the links?
Where are the links?Come on, boyz, post the links, show us some evidence that xB3 failed.
We all can prove that Bioasis failed, but proving xB3 failed is a whole other thing.
I agree that there is significant likelihood that xB3 doesn't work, or at least has issues sufficient to cause work to stop.
You guys thiunk that I'm trying to convince you and other shareholders of somethinbg else.
WRONG!!!!!!!
If mangement at any time in Bioasis' history knew that xB3 had killer problems and didn't tell us then I thuink they should be fully exposed for that. Until the very end, they expressed confidence in xB3. That confidence is still being expressed to a large degree in the description of Bioasis and xB3 at the top of this very Stockhouse page. They were mantaining that position until the moment they all resigned from the BoD and their offices.
And, yes, I do knoiw a heck of a lot more than you guys do about this stuff. No brag. Just a fact. But as is obvious, I also reveal the stuff I don't know, including whether xB3 can never work as a drug delivery agent using receptor-mediated transcytosis.
Unlike you guys, I will not say, WITHOUT PROOF, that xB3 does not work. No public evidence has be issued to show that it does not work. There is some public evidence that it does work. I'm really suspicious that it doesn't work, but I refuse to say that for certain. If xB3 didn't (doesn't) work, then we (WE, all of us!!!) must consider that we may have been purposefully deceived about the issue.
What other reasons might there be for Chiesi cancelling their agreement with Bioasis? Kinda obvious, really.
jd