RE:1student you wroteAs conveyed within the most recent Quarterly report, management suggested $400,000.00 worth of previously processed and previously inventoried graphite material has not been found;and yet, company management didn't report it stolen?
Where did that $400,000.00 worth of NGC "minority" equities investors owned, previously processed and previously inventoried large flake graphite material go Hugues Jacquemin?
Why hasn't anybody been arrested for what would be an apparent $400.000.00 theft of previously declared as processed and previously accounted for and declared as inventoried graphite material Hugues Jacquemin?
Who has been necessarily held accountable for such an apparent theft of NGC.V "minority" equities investors owned and company held assets?
Everybody and their cousins know that you don't simply walk off with $400,000.00 of decalred as previously processed and previously inventoried graphite material; it gets trucked out of the company property. That is how the previously processed and previously inventoried graphite material is allowed to leave the company facilities; this only after it is guaranteed to be paid for of course.
Who was the employee ultimately responsible for the measuring of and determined counting of and declaring of that $400,000.00 worth of processed and previously inventoried graphite material; such graphite material is representative of a NGC.V equities investors owned and company held asset that was, given there has not been any other explination made available for we shareholders, supposedly stolen right out from underneath your nose Mr. Hugues Jacquemin?
It's clearly understood that you methodically facilitated the relieving of us from a great deal of our respectively invested monies here, having done so by employing quite intentionally conveyed false representations on several occassions since you had been appointed CEO.
It's an established as documented fact that the TSX-V regulatory authorities previously officially admonished you for having done so, as representing yourself first and foremost and on behalf of "the company"; and yet, subsequent to said official admonishment, you just kept on doing more of the same .
You, Mr. Hugues Jacquemin, present as historically having a serious problem with - a seeming outright aversion to - wanting to convey and actually needing to disclose the whole truth of any NGC business matter, i.e. the whole truth without intentional and specific omission on your part, on behalf of "the company", and ultimately as benefiting yourself and the others.
That's correct youknowwhat.
Come Monday and/or shortly thereafter, we are going to find out that which we wern't told by management.
Understand that when a company such as NGC doesn't have two extra nickels to rub together, so to speak, $400,000.00 worth of previously mined, processed, previously accounted for and vouched for as inventoried graphite material not being able to be found . . . Suffice to say that is, given the financial circumstances which the company is presently facing and the monies not yet paid to and owned to Sprott", "a materially relevant event which could have materially impacted the business of the company.
Why wasn't such a discovery disclosed upon management discovering the graphite material in question was missing?
Why was such materially relevant information quite intentionally withheld from we NGC.V "minority" equities investors?