RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:OlaThe rumpers have tried to spin Eric as being behind/part of the deal. He is NOT. All he did ws agree to VOTE his shares in favor of the deal!!!! Why would he not? He owns 60 million plus shares with a cost base around 6 cents or less!!!! thats a 6 o 7 bagger on a stock he has no liquidity on!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now Eric would be relying on AMK board and mangaement that the deal was real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHy would a board accept a rumper flumper bid?????
Whether he HAD TO vote his shares or not is really not that relevant. AMK tried to spin it that the agreement had expired already.
As I said, my guess is Eric is pretty miffed at the board and managemnet right now..................
roberto146 wrote: Why would he .... who knows. Fact is Sprott isn't always right.
Excerpt in the 2019 article I linked to:
"As part of this financing and the issuing of the Units, Mr. Sprott has agreed to sign a voting agreement in which he will vote with management in the event of a hostile takeover bid, and to also vote with management if management agrees to accept a takeover bid"
Maybe just linking to the lengthy article was a bit too subtle ...