RE:RE:CATL is not going to be doing business in USA
GorillaDome47,
You stated "Good luck to Ford trying to muscle that JV between themselves and CATL through...haha...the time for Chinese collaboration is past, at least for a while...I guess Ford will just have to build batteries here in NA with NA resources and tech...lucky for Ford, NGC has porocarb and recent Rain Carbon JV could go a long way!"
LOL! LOL! LOL! You have me rolling on the floor laughing my assets off, so to speak, lol!
You stated "...lucky for Ford, NGC has porocarb and recent Rain Carbon JV could go a long way!"
Let's get something clear GorillaDome47.
"PorocarbTM" is presently as useless as those so called assets over in Namibia are; and also those clowns in Germany, so called battery materials scientists who are now somehow being far too exorbitantly compensated by NGC to sit around with their respective fingers stuck far up within their respective nasal cavities whislt trying to pick out a winner, lol, . . .
Suffice to say those now NGC Battery Materials Group failures are persons who previously worked for Heraeus Group doing much of the same thing for the past at least 11 years; they are the very persons who clearly failed at fully developing - over a ten year period to boot - a "Porocarb TM" product that necessarily needed to be and yet has not been sufficiently developed, performance tested and thrid party validated, necessarily qualified and finally certified by or on behalf of any single collaborating NDA entering into OEM party and potential customer.
Who the flock of seagulls are they trying to fool? They simply are not fooling anybody.
Hugues Jacquemin et al yet again went about blowing previously company owned assets (an intentionally untold amount of in-situ graphite and/or monies, etc) in purchasing so called assets from Gernamy's Heraeus Group. These are so called assets that are clearly representative of what are called "white elephants".
Why, you ask, did Hugues Jacquemin et al do all this?
ANSWER: To further indebt NGC beyond solvency and in order to have all the then existing and remaining company equity control over so called "company owned and so called majority equity controlled assets (there is another Hugues Jacquemin et al suggested mistruth) privately shifted, shuffled and dealt into the implicit control of certain encumbering senior secured creditors, the most senior secured and first lien company creditor being Sprott" and another creditor being that corporation that Gregorry Bowes provides so called "consulting services for".
What does Greggory Bowes "consult" the principals of that company with respect to? Does Greggory Bowes tell them how to go about failing for more than 25 years at supposedly trying to develop the Bissett Creek graphite bearing lands project?
Does Greggory Bowes consult those NGC creditor corporation operating principals on how to facilitate Gregorry Bowes privately ensuring to have that particular NGC creditor hold an exclusively hived off slice of NGC assets for Gregorry Bowes when the time comes - not really a question.
Who the flock of seagulls is Gregorry Bowes trying to fool.
Keep in mind that once just one of those Gregorry Bowes facilitating NGC creditor representatives is "turned" (buttons get pushed, so to speak, all the time and specific results are had), Gergorry Bowes is likely going to have the worst professional day of his entire life.
As for Hugues Jacquemin, I expect something really special for that particular individual. I hope he enjoys it. Love ya Hugues Jacquemin.